Monday, 28 December 2015

Fii autentic cu orice pret  <3Смайлик «heart» To be authentic at any price
Nu folosi masti..
Autenticitatea in
a a fi
indiferent ce s-ar întâmpla
asa cum esti cu orice pret
cu orice risc
sa Nu iti impui sa fii ceea ce Nu esti
sa Nu fii ipocrit!
Authenticity, To Be True, not to be false, as you are at any price
any risk
not to use masks
Whatsoever is your real face, show it...and at whatsoever the cost
Authenticity in
To Be
Do not impose to be what you are not
Do not be a hypocrite!
The guide exists within you; you carry the blueprint.
Acel ghid există în interiorul tău; tu ai schema pentru a te ghida.
Osho(Yoga: A New Direction, Talk # 7)

Thursday, 24 December 2015


Jiddu Krishnamurti:
“You know, if we understand one question rightly, all questions are answered. But we don't know how to ask the right question. To ask the right question demands a great deal of intelligence and sensitivity. 
Here is a question, a fundamental question: is life a torture? 

It is, as it is; and man has lived in this torture centuries upon centuries, from ancient history to the present day, in agony, in despair, in sorrow; and he doesn't find a way out of it. 

Therefore he invents gods, churches, all the rituals, and all that nonsense, or he escapes in different ways. What we are trying to do, during all these discussions and talks here, is to see if we cannot radically bring about a transformation of the mind, not accept things as they are, nor revolt against them. 

Revolt doesn't answer a thing. 
You must understand it, go into it, examine it, give your heart and your mind, with everything that you have, to find out a way of living differently. 

That depends on you, and not on someone else, 
because in this there is no teacher, no pupil; there is no leader; there is no guru; there is no Master, no Saviour. You yourself are the teacher and the pupil; you are the Master; you are the guru; you are the leader; you are everything. And to understand is to transform what is. 

I think that will be enough, won't it?” 


― Jiddu Krishnamurti https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5E9gS4RZOo&index=3&list=PL1n30s-LKus4wKy6tSVR4LjHIGrwkWC1u



"We find ourselves living in fear of war, of losing a job, if we have one, in fear of terrorism, of the violence of our children, of being at the mercy of inept politicians. How do we meet life as it is today?"

Question: We find ourselves living in fear of war, of losing a job, if we have one, in fear of terrorism, of the violence of our children, of being at the mercy of inept politicians. How do we meet life as it is today?
Krishnamurti: How do you meet it? One must take it for granted the world is becoming more and more violent, it is obvious. The threats of war are also very obvious – South Africa, Middle East and so on. And also it is a very strange phenomena that our children are becoming violent too. One remembers a mother coming to see us one year, in India. The mother was horrified because in the Indian tradition mothers are considered with great respect. And she came to see us and said, ‘My children have beaten me’ – an unheard of thing in India. You understand? So this violence is spreading all over the world. And there is the fear of losing a job, as the questioner says. Facing all this, knowing all this how does one meet life as it is today?
I don’t know. One knows for oneself. I know how to meet it for myself but one doesn’t know how you will meet it. First, what is life, what is this thing called existence, full of sorrow, overpopulation, inept politicians, all the trickeries, dishonesty, bribery that is going on in the world, how does one meet it? So one must first, surely, enquire: what does it mean to live? What does it mean to live in this world as it is? How do we live our daily life, actually, not theoretically, not philosophically or idealistically, but actually how do we live our daily life? If we examine it, or are aware of it seriously, it is a constant battle, constant struggle, effort after effort, even to get up in the morning is an effort. What shall we do? It comes down to that. We cannot possibly escape from it. I used to know several people who said the world is impossible to live in, and they withdrew totally, completely into some Himalayan mountains and to the Sierras of California and disappeared. That is merely an avoidance, an escape from reality. Or to lose oneself in a commune, or join some guru with vast estates and get lost also in it. Those people do not obviously solve the problems of daily life, or enquire into the change, into the psychological revolution of a society. They escape from all this. And we, if we do not escape and are actually living in this world as it is, what shall we do? Can we change our life? To have no conflict at all in our life, is that possible? Because conflict is part of violence. This constant struggle to be something, both in the world, economically, socially, morally and inwardly, to be something is the basis of our life – to struggle, to struggle.
Can we, as human beings living in this world, change ourselves? That is really the question. Radically, psychologically transform ourselves, not eventually, but not admitting time. For a serious man, for a really religious mind, there is no tomorrow. This is rather a hard saying: but there is no tomorrow, there is only the rich worship of today. And can we live wholly this life? And actually, daily, transform our relationship with each other? That is the real issue. Not the world, what the world is, the world is us. One more and more sees the actual reality that the world is us. Please, this is so: the world is you and you are the world and the world is you. That is an obvious, terrible fact. And if we don’t meet that challenge completely, that is to realise that we are the world with all its ugliness, we have contributed to all this, we are responsible for all this: what is happening in the Middle East, in Africa and all the craziness that is going on in the world – we are responsible for it. One may not actually be responsible but our grandfathers, grandmothers and great grandfathers have been responsible for all this – slavery, thousands of wars, Empire, the brutality of empires, of which we are a part. And if we don’t feel very responsible for all this, which means responsible utterly for ourselves, what we do, what we think, how we behave, then it becomes rather hopeless, knowing what the world is, knowing that we cannot individually, separately, solve this problem of terrorism, which is the problem of governments: to see that its citizens are safe, protected. They don’t seem to care. If each government was really concerned that its own people must be protected there would be no wars. But apparently governments have lost sanity too, they are only thinking party politics, their own power, position, prestige – you know the whole game of it.
So can we, not admitting time, that is tomorrow, the future, live in such a way that today is all important? So one has to become so extraordinarily alert to our reactions, to our confusion – you know, work like fury on ourselves. And that is the only thing we can do apparently. And if we don’t do that there is really no future for man. I do not know if you have not followed some of the headlines in the newspapers, they are all preparing for war. And if you are preparing for something you are going to have it – like preparing a good dish. And apparently the ordinary people in the world don’t seem to care. And those who are intellectually, scientifically involved in the production of war don’t seem to care. They are only interested in their careers, in their jobs, in their research. And those of us who are fairly ordinary people, so-called middle class, if we don’t care at all, then we are really throwing up the sponge. And the tragedy is that we don’t seem to care either. We don’t seem to get together, think together, work together. We are only too willing to join institutions, organizations, hoping organizations, institutions will stop wars, will stop butchering each other. They have never done it. Institutions, organizations will never stop any of this; it is the human heart and the human mind that is involved in this. Please we are not talking rhetorically but we are facing something really very, very, very dangerous. We have met some of the prominent people who are involved in all this, they don’t care. But if we care for our life, daily life is lived rightly, if each one of us was aware of what we are doing daily, then I think there is some hope for the future. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwvkmFzGPYc&feature=youtu.be

Fii autentic cu orice pret Autenticitatea Este un fenomen foarte, foarte periculos; numai unele persoane îşi pot asuma acest risc.

Fii autentic cu orice pret
Autenticitatea Este un fenomen foarte, foarte periculos;
numai unele persoane îşi pot asuma acest risc.

 A fi acum si aici inseamna sa fii Autentic...
Fii autentic cu orice pret
Nu folosi masti..
fii fidel prezentului si vei fi autentic
A fi autentic înseamnă a fi cinstit cu tine însuţi.

Este un fenomen foarte, foarte periculos;
numai unele persoane îşi pot asuma acest risc.

Dar, ori de câte ori oamenii şi-l asumă, nu au decât de câştigat.
Ei ating frumuseţea, graţia, mulţumirea, lucrurile pe care nu ţi le poţi imagina.

Dacă toată lumea pare atât de frustrată, atunci motivul este că nu au dat ascultare vocii interioare…
Ține minte, fii fidel vocii tale lăuntrice, indiferent ce s-ar întâmpla. Urmeaz-o, și dacă ea te duce în pericol, intră în pericol, dar rămâi fidel față de ea. Atunci există posibilitatea ca într-o zi să ajungi la o stare în care vei putea dansa de împlinire lăuntrică, de satisfacție interioară.
Să fii autentic înseamnă să fii conform cu tine însuți. E un fenomen foarte, foarte periculos. Însă oamenii care o fac dobândesc o frumusețe, o grație, o mulțumire de neimaginat.
Fii fidel prezentului, și atunci vei fi autentic. A fi aici și acum înseamnă a fi autentic. Fără trecut, fără viitor – cu totul în prezent. Eternitatea este momentul prezent.
Osho

Sunday, 6 December 2015

 "  Only Love Is The Real Meditation
     All others are Meditation Techniques
Only Meditation is the real Love
                     All others are love techniques "    

Monday, 30 November 2015

IT is one of the perennial questions of humanity:
the question of freedom and responsibility.
If you are free, you interpret it as if now there is no responsibility. Just a hundred years ago Friedrich Nietzsche declared, "God is dead, and man is free." And the next sentence he wrote is, "Now you can do whatsoever you want to do. There is no responsibility. God is dead, man is free, and there is no responsibility."
There he was absolutely wrong; when there is no God, there is TREMENDOUS responsibility on your shoulders. If there is a God, he can share your responsibility. You can throw your responsibility on Him. You can say, "It is YOU who have made the world; it is YOU who have made me in this way; it is YOU who is finally, ultimately, responsible, not me. How can I be ultimately responsible? I am just a creature, and you are the creator. Why have you put seeds of corruption in me and seeds of sin in me from the beginning? You are responsible. I am free."
In fact, if there is no God, then man is ABSOLUTELY responsible for his acts, because there is no way to throw responsibility on anybody else. When I say to you that you are free, I mean that you are responsible. You cannot throw responsibility on anybody else, you are alone. And whatsoever you do, it is your doing. You cannot say that somebody else forced you to do it -- because you are free; nobody can force you! Because you are free, it is your decision to do something or not to do something.
With freedom comes responsibility. Freedom IS responsibility. But the mind is very cunning, the mind interprets in its own way: it always goes on listening to that which it wants to listen to. It goes on interpreting things in its own way. The mind never tries to understand what really is the truth. It has taken that decision already...
People go on talking about freedom, but they don't want freedom exactly, they want irresponsibility. They ask for freedom, but deep down, unconsciously, they ask for irresponsibility, licence. Freedom is maturity; licence is very childish. Freedom is possible only when you are so integrated that you can take the responsibility of being free. The world is not free because people are not mature. Revolutionaries have been doing many things down through the centuries, but everything fails. Utopians have been continuously thinking of how to make man free, but nobody bothers -- because man cannot be free unless he is integrated. Only a Buddha can be free, a Mahavira can be free, a Christ, a Mohammed can be free, a Zarathustra can be free, because freedom means the man now is aware.
If you are not aware, then the state is needed; the government is needed, the police is needed, the court is needed. Then freedom has to be cut from everywhere. Then freedom exists only in name; in fact it doesn't exist. How can freedom exist when governments exist? -- it is impossible. But what to do?
If governments disappear, there will simply be anarchy. Freedom will not come in if governments disappear, there will simply be anarchy. It will be a worse state than it is now. It will be sheer madness. The police are needed because you are not alert. Otherwise, what is the point of having a policeman standing on the crossroad? If people are alert, the policeman can be removed, will have to be removed, because it is unnecessary. But people are not conscious.
So when I say 'freedom', I mean be responsible. The more responsible you become, the more free you become; or, the more free you become, the more responsibility comes on you. Then you have to be very alert to what you are doing, what you are saying. Even about your small unconscious gestures you have to be very alert -- because there is nobody else to control you, it is only you. When I say to you that you are free, I mean that you are a God. It is not licence, it is tremendous discipline.
~ Osho

Tantra says ONE HAS TO UNDERSTAND SEX, to decode sex. If sex is so vital that life comes out of it, then there must be something more to it. That something more is the key towards Divinity, towards God.
The Tantra Vision

Vol 1, Ch #2: The goose is out!
If you remain aware, you will come to know that SEX IS NOT JUST SEX. Sex is the outermost layer, deep inside is the love, and even deeper is prayer, and deepest is God himself. Sex can become a cosmic experience. Then it is Tantra.


SEX IS A VERY PRIMITIVE THING, it is an animal heritage. Nothing is wrong in it, it is just very old. And as you grow more and more mature, you start searching for something new and greater, something better and higher, something superior. Sex seems to be something below you -- a little childish, a little immature.

It is good. THERE IS A TIME WHEN YOU CAN FOOL AROUND. And while you are meditating, your maturity comes sooner, your centering comes sooner, your awareness about things becomes clearer every day. 

And sex is going to be the first victim of your awareness -- then other things will follow -- because SEX IS THE VERY ROOT OF YOUR ANIMALITY.



ONE HAS TO UNDERSTAND SEX, to decode sex. If sex is so vital that life comes out of it, then there must be something more to it. The Tantra attitude about sex is that SEX IS NOT A NEED, IT IS A COSMIC EXPERIENCE, it is an experience of meditation. It is an instinctual return to our ultimate reality, one of the highest forms of meditation.
—OSHO—

“— Я верю в величие нации.
— Оно только пережиток предприимчивости
и напористости.
— В нём залог развития.
— Упадок мне милее.
— А как же искусство?
— Оно — болезнь.
— А любовь?
— Иллюзия.
— А религия?
— Распространённый суррогат веры.
— Вы скептик.
— Ничуть! Ведь скептицизм — начало веры.
— Да кто же вы?
— Определить —
значит ограничить.
— Ну дайте мне хоть нить!..
— Нити обрываются. И вы рискуете заблудиться
в лабиринте”
(Oscar Wilde)

Saturday, 28 November 2015

"Амритасья путра – о сыновья бессмертных, лишь тех, кто слышал такой призыв, можно назвать истинными детьми Индии. Никто другой не становится Искателем. Вы можете родиться в любом месте на земле; в любой стране, в любом веке, в прошлом или в будущем, но если ваш поиск – это поиск внутреннего осознания, вы сыновья Индии. Для меня Индия и духовность это синонимы. Индия и религиозность – это синонимы". 
Ошо, из книги "Индия – моя любовь".

How can the pearl be gained merely by looking at the sea?

Rumi: "Существует город, где ты найдешь всё что пожелаешь — привлекательных людей, удовольствия, всяческие украшения — всё, чего жаждет естество. Однако ты не сможешь найти там и одного мудреца.
Этот город — человек. Будь там хоть сто тысяч достижений, но если нет главного — любящего сердца — то лучше бы этому городу лежать в руинах."
"You find a city with everything you desire, beautiful people, pleasures, all that people crave, and ornaments of every kind, but you find not one generous person.
That city is the human being. If in us are a hundred thousand talents, but not that essential element, better if that city were in ruins. " Rumi  

http://www.littleknownpubs.com/Rumi50.htm                    

Friday, 27 November 2015

This aloneness Это одиночество


"Это одиночество стоит больше, чем тысяча жизней. 
Эта свобода стоит больше, чем всё пространство на земле. 
Быть единым с Истиной только на мгновение, стоит больше, чем мир и сама жизнь." 

"This aloneness is worth more than a thousand lives.
This freedom is worth more than all the lands on earth.
To be one with the truth for just a moment,
Is worth more than the world and life itself." Rumi.


ПРИТЧА. Пчела и муха

Пришли к старцу несколько человек и говорят: такой-то священник берет много денег за таинства, такой-то курит много сигарет и ходит в кафетерии, другой аморальный – и представляют доказательства.

Тогда старец начал им говорить:

— Из опыта я познал, что в этой жизни люди разделяются на две категории. Третьей не существует: человек будет или в одной категории, или в другой. Одна категория людей подобна мухе. Муха имеет ту особенность, что всегда садится на всё грязное. Например, если в саду много благоухающих цветов, а в углу сада животное сделало нечистоту, она пролетит весь прекрасный сад, не садясь ни на один из цветков. Только когда увидит где-то нечистоту, тогда сразу спустится и сядет на неё и начнёт копаться в ней, наслаждаясь зловонием, возникающим от ворошения, и не может оторваться.

Если бы она могла говорить, и ты, поймав ее, спросил, знает ли она, где в саду находятся розы, то та ответила бы, что не знает, что это такое. “Я, — скажет, — знаю, где есть помойки, туалеты, нечистоты животных, грязь...” Подобным образом и в жизни, есть люди, похожие на муху. Эта категория людей, которая научилась о всем думать отрицательно и всюду находить злое, не замечая и игнорируя все доброе.

Другая категория людей похожа на пчелу. Особенность пчелы — находить и садиться на красивое и сладкое. Скажем, например, что в грязном помещении, кто-то в углу поставил вазу с цветком. Если залетит туда пчела, она пролетит мимо всего грязного и не сядет до тех пор, пока не найдет цветок и только там остановится.

И если бы ты поймал эту пчелу и спросил, где там мусор или помойки, она ответит, что ничего такого она не заметил, зато вот там есть гортензии, а там — розы, а еще дальше — фиалки, там — мёд, а вот там — сахар… Она окажется знатоком всего доброго и не будет иметь совершенно никакого понятия о чем-либо дурном. Добрые помыслы и думают и видят хорошее.

Так и человек находится или в категории мухи, или пчелы.

И закончил Старец:
— Когда ко мне приходят люди и начинают обвинять других, я привожу им этот пример и предлагаю выбрать, в какой категории они хотят находиться, и соответственно определить и тех людей, которых обвиняют.

"Ты говоришь, что любишь дождь, но ты используешь зонт, гуляя под ним. Ты говоришь, что любишь солнце, но разыскиваешь тенек, когда оно светит.Ты говоришь, что любишь ветер, но когда он дует ты закрываешь окно. Вот почему я боюсь,что ты скажешь,что любишь меня" Боб Марли.

Очень немногие люди в мире познали любовь. Это те люди, которые стали такими молчаливыми, такими мирными… и в этом молчании и мире они пришли в контакт со своим глубочайшим внутренним существом, со своей душой. Когда ты соприкасаешься со своей душой, любовь становится для тебя не отношениями, но просто следует за тобою как тень. Куда бы ты ни двигался, с кем бы ты ни был, ты любишь.
То, что ты прямо сейчас называешь любовью, на кого-то направлено, кем-то ограничено. А любовь - не то явление, которое можно ограничить.

Ошо

Я хотел бы заботиться о тебе - не желая тебя изменить; Любить тебя - оставляя тебя на свободе; Принимать тебя всерьез - ни к чему не принуждая; Приходить к тебе - не навязывая себя; Что-то дарить тебе - не ожидая ничего в ответ; Уметь прощаться с тобой - не боясь потерять тебя навсегда; Говорить с тобой о моих чувствах - не возлагая на тебя ответственность за них;
Делиться с тобой знаниями - не поучая тебя; Радоваться тебе такому - каков ты есть. 
Если и ты с такими же чувствами шагнешь мне навстречу - мы сможем обогатить друг друга. 

Джебран Халиль Джебран.

Любите друг друга, но не превращайте Любовь в цепи. Пусть лучше она будет волнующимся морем между берегами ваших душ. Наполняйте друг другу чаши, но не пейте из одной чаши. Давайте друг другу вкусить своего хлеба, но не ешьте от одного куска. Пойте, танцуйте вместе и радуйтесь, но пусть каждый из вас будет одинок, как одиноки струны лютни, хотя от них исходит одна музыка. Стойте вместе, но не слишком близко друг к другу, ибо колонны храма стоят порознь, а дуб и кипарис не растут в тени друг друга.
Джебран Халиль Джебран.

WHAT DO YOU SAY ABOUT SEX
EDUCATION FOR SMALL CHILDREN?

Truth is truth, and nobody should be debarred from it.

Just because children are small, do they have to be fed on lies?

Is truth only for grown-ups?
Does that mean truth is dangerous for the delicate consciousness of the child?

Truth is never dangerous, untruth is dangerous. And if you tell an untruth to the grown-up he may be able to defend himself; it can be forgiven.

But never tell an untruth to the child, because he is so helpless, so indefensible. He depends so much on you, he trusts so much in you – don’t betray him.

This is betraying!
Telling any lie means you have betrayed the child.

And finally you will be in trouble.

Sooner or later, the child will discover that you have been telling lies.

That very day, all trust in you will disappear.
If young people start rebelling against the parents, the responsibility is not theirs, the responsibility is of the parents.

They have been telling so many lies; and now, by and by, the children start
discovering that they were ALL lies.

And if you have been telling so many lies, even the truth that you have told them becomes suspicious.

And one thing is certain, they lose trust in you. You have betrayed them, you have deceived them: you become ugly in their consciousness.

Their impression of you is no good any more. In fact they will never be able to trust anybody.

What is wrong?
Sex is a simple fact: tell it the way it is.

And children are very very perceptive – even if you don’t tell them they will discover it on their own. They are very curious people.

Carl was assigned to write a composition entitled, ”Where I came from.” When he returned home from school, he entered the kitchen where his mother was preparing dinner.
”Where did I come from, Mama?” he asked.
”The stork brought you.”
”And where did Daddy come from?”
”The stork brought him, too.”
”And what about Grandpa?”

”Why, the stork brought him too, darling.”
Carl very carefully made notes on what Mama had told him, and the next day he handed in the following composition:

”According to my calculations, there hasn’t been a natural birth in my family for the past three generations.”

Children are very perceptive; they go on watching, they go on seeing what foolishness you are telling them.

And how long can you deceive them?
Life is there, and life is sexual.

And they are watching life: they will see animals making love, they will see birds making love.

And you may go on believing that they have never seen you making love – you can go on believing it, but children know that their parents make love.

In the beginning they may think they are fighting or something, but sooner or later they discover that something is going on behind their backs.

Why create these suspicions and doubts? Why not be true?

Truth is always good, truth is always divine. Let them know things as they are.

Children are very perceptive; they go on watching, they go on seeing what foolishness you are telling them.

And how long can you deceive them?
Life is there, and life is sexual.

And they are watching life: they will see animals making love, they will see birds making love.

And you may go on believing that they have never seen you making love – you can go on believing it, but children know that their parents make love.

In the beginning they may think they are fighting or something, but sooner or later they discover that something is going on behind their backs.

Why create these suspicions and doubts? Why not be true? Truth is always good, truth is always divine.

Let them know things as they are.

Truth can never be the enemy, sexual or otherwise.
Befriend truth.

And children are very understanding, they immediately accept the fact. They have no prejudices, they have no notion of right and wrong. If you tell them the truth they understand it is so and they forget all about it.

And it will create a great trust in you: you never deceived them.

Sex education is one of the fundamental causes of the rift between the generations.

They day the child discovers that his parents have been deceiving him, he loses all roots in trust.

That is the most devastating shock you can give to that delicate system.

Go on telling the truth as it is, and don’t try to philosophize about it and don’t go on round and round.
Tell it the way it is.

Why is there so much fear about it in you? Because your parents did not tell YOU.

So you feel a little shaky, nervous, afraid, as if you are moving in some dangerous territory.

Be very simple, direct.

And whenever a child enquires about anything, if you know about it, tell it.

OshO ❤
CHAPTER 6. THE BRIDGE OF LOVE AND LAUGHTER
Unio Mystica, Vol 1

Thursday, 26 November 2015

Enemies, inner and outer - how to behave towards them 

"Why do so many remarkable people arouse such terrible enmities? Because the dark forces they have expelled from their inner world return to attack them, but from the outside, through those who find their qualities, virtues and strength of character upsetting and disturbing. People who lead an ordinary life, on the other hand, do not upset or disturb anyone, and everyone is happy with them.
It is not easy to confront the outer enemies, but they are less dangerous than the inner ones. With the outer enemies, you have to use kindness, gentleness and patience, whereas with the inner enemies, you require firmness, authority and severity. Unfortunately, most people tend to do the opposite instead: they are patient and lenient towards their inner enemies, so keeping them alive, but they are extremely severe towards their outer enemies, who of course retaliate. So is it surprising if they continue to struggle with inextricable difficulties?"

Omraam Mikhael Aivanhov

"Почему столько выдающихся людей вызывают неприязнь? Потому что темные силы, которые они выпустили из своего внутреннего мира, возвращаются и атакуют их, но уже извне, через посредничество других людей, которых беспокоят или смущают их достоинства, добродетели, сила характера. Люди же, ведущие жизнь ординарную, напротив, никого не беспокоят и не смущают, и ими все довольны.
Нелегко сопротивляться внешним врагам, но, тем не менее, они менее опасны, чем враги внутренние. С первыми нужно использовать доброту, мягкость, терпение, тогда как со вторыми – твердость, авторитарность, строгость. К сожалению, большинство людей скорее склонны делать наоборот: они терпеливы, снисходительны по отношению к своим внутренним врагам, и таким образом они их культивируют. В то же время они проявляют крайнюю строгость к своим внешним врагам, которые, конечно же, наносят ответный удар. Так что же удивительного в том, что они постоянно барахтаются в тех же проблемах? "
Омраам Микаэль Айванхов



The Powers of Thought

Human Beings have become so used to operating at a superficial level that it is now difficult to introduce them to any alternatives.
They are unaware that working with thoughts can open up extraordinary possibilities that no other activity can ever provide.
Most human work involves, to some degree, stirring up the coarser material, while the work of thought allows the extraction of the essence.
If you do not know how to work with your thoughts, to concentrate, to control yourself, to direct your energies to the upper regions of yourself, you will just clutter your life and be unable to achieve anything until you learn to extract the quintessence.
A great many people have ideas, but they live in such a way that there is never any connection between their ideas and their actions.
There must be an intermediary, a bridge, and that intermediary is feeling, emotion.
When it enters the dimension of the emotions, an idea takes on flesh and blood and becomes capable of influencing matter.
Feeling, therefore, is the lever that is capable of touching matter.
Thought is too remote, too subtle; it passes matter by without touching it or causing it to vibrate.
Let me explain this to you by analogy, with the help of a phenomenon familiar to all of you: the action of the sun on air, water and earth (...)

If human beings knew how to interpret and apply to their inner lives, this normal, natural process of the sun's action on the earth through the intermediary of air and water, they would be capable of tremendous transformations, both inwardly and outwardly.

This is what the power of thought consists of! 

Omraam Mikhaël Aïvanhov

Do not rely on time. Time is death. Who waits--dies. Life is now only.

Questioner: It will take much time if I just wait for self-realization.
Maharaj: What have you to wait for when it is already here and now? You have only to look and see. Look at your self, at your own being. You know that you are and you like it. Abandon all imagining, that is all. Do not rely on time. Time is death. Who waits--dies. Life is now only. Do not talk to me about past and future--they exist only in your mind.
Questioner: You too will die.
Maharaj: I am dead already. Physical death will make no difference in my case. I am timeless being. I am free of desire or fear, because I do not remember the past or imagine the future. Where there are no names and shapes, how can there be desire and fear? With desirelessness comes timelessness. I am safe, because what is not, cannot touch what is. You feel unsafe, because you imagine danger. Of course, your body as such is complex and vulnerable and needs protection. But not you. Once you realize your own unassailable being, you will be at peace.
Questioner: How can I find peace when the world suffers?
Maharaj: The world suffers for very valid reasons. If you want to help the world, you must be beyond the need of help. Then all your doing as well as not doing will help the world most effectively.
Nisargadatta Maharaj


Wednesday, 25 November 2015

O Silent Laughter – smile Thou through my soul. O, râset tăcut, zâmbeşte prin tot sufletul meu.


O Silent Laughter – smile Thou through my soul.
O, râset tăcut, zâmbeşte prin tot sufletul meu.

 Let my soul smile through my heart. And let my heart
smile through my eyes.
O Prince of Smiles! Be enthroned beneath the canopy of my countenance, and I will protect Thy tender
Self in the castle of my sincerity, that no rebel hypocrisy may lurk to destroy Thee.
Make Thou me a smile-millionaire, that I may scatter Thy rich smiles in sad hearts freely, everywhere!

„O, râset tăcut, zâmbeşte prin tot sufletul meu. Permite-i sufletului meu să zâmbească prin inimă, iar inima să zâmbească prin ochii mei. O, Prinţe al Zâmbetelor, urcă pe tron la umbra sprijinului meu, iar eu voi proteja Sinele Tău tandru în castelul sincerităţii mele, astfel încât nicio ipocrizie rebelă să nu se poată furişa pentru a Te distruge. Fă-mă un Milionar al Zâmbetelor, pentru a putea risipi liber zâmbetul tău în inimile triste, peste tot!”

 Paramhansa Yogananda (Whispers from Eternity)

Love your children, but never hope through them

"Each child is Poisoned by the society through teaching him Ambition. Ambition is a poison far more dangerous than any alcohol can ever be, far more dangerous than marijuana or LSD, because ambition destroys your whole life. It keeps you moving in a false direction. It keeps you imagining, desiring, dreaming, it keeps you wasting your life. Ambition means a subtle creation of the ego, and once the ego is created you are in the grip of darkness. And the whole social structure depends on ambition.
Be the first! Wherever you are, whatsoever you are doing: be the first! — as if being the first has something divine about it. By what means you become the first is irrelevant. By right means or wrong means, succeed! As if success in itself has become equivalent to life, synonymous with life. Life has nothing to do with success. Success keeps you rushing towards the future and that becomes your intoxicant. Hoping, hoping for the tomorrow, wasting that which you have or that which you don’t have and will never have."
~ OSHO

"The wider spread are the wings of your love, the bigger is the sky of your being."

"The wider spread are the wings of your love, the bigger is the sky of your being."Смайлик «heart»


"This is one of the most significant things about all human beings; their love is always for somebody, it is addressed – and the moment you address your love, you destroy it. It is as if you are saying, “I will breathe only for you – and when you are not there, then how can I breathe?”
Love should be like breathing. It should be just a quality in you – wherever you are, with whomsoever you are, or even if you are alone, love goes on overflowing from you. It is not a question of being in love with someone – it is a question of being love.
People are frustrated in their love experiences, not because something is wrong with love…they narrow down love to such a point that the ocean of love cannot remain there. You cannot contain the ocean – it is not a small stream; love is your whole being – love is your godliness. One should think in terms of whether one is loving or not. The question of the object of love does not arise. With your wife, you love your wife; with your children, you love your children; with your servants, you love your servants; with your friends, you love your friends; with the trees, you love the trees; with the ocean, you love the ocean.
You are love.
Love is not dependent on the object, but is a radiation of your subjectivity – a radiation of your soul. And the vaster the radiation, the greater is your soul. The wider spread are the wings of your love, the bigger is the sky of your being.
You have lived under a common fallacy of all human beings. Now you are asking, “Am I able to love you?” – again, the same fallacy.
Just ask: Am I able to become love?"
Osho

Tuesday, 24 November 2015

There is no question of accepting two masters. It is not a question of masters, it is a question of surrender.
If you are surrendered to Christ, you are surrendered to me. If you are surrendered to me, you are surrendered to Christ, to Buddha, to Mahavira, to Krishna.
The question is of surrender. If you know how to surrender, then all the masters are one. Then you will find Christ in Buddha, and Buddha in Christ.
The surrendered heart becomes so deeply harmonious that it can see that Krishna and Christ are not different. Certainly their language is different – Krishna speaks Sanskrit, Christ speaks Aramaic. Certainly they use different metaphors, different parables. They are different fingers, but pointing to the same moon.
If you can see the moon, will you be worried about the fingers? If you can see the moon, will you be obsessed with the finger – whether the finger is that of Krishna or Christ or Buddha or Lao Tzu?
What does it matter? Once the moon is known, the fingers are forgotten. To become too obsessed with the finger is a state of pathology. The Hindu is ill, the Mohammedan is ill, the Christian is ill. They have become too fascinated, obsessed with the fingers.
There is only one moon, but it is reflected in a thousand and one lakes. Don’t become too attached to the reflection in the lakes, don’t become too attached to the lake. The lake has nothing to do with the moon; even if the lake disappears, the moon remains. The lake may become disturbed, the reflection may be lost, but the Moon is there.
~ Osho


Thursday, 19 November 2015

Osho on Patanjali

Патанджали – это большая редкость. Он просветленный человек, как Будда, Кришна, Христос, Махавира, Мухаммед, Заратустра, но он отличается от них в одном. Будда, Кришна, Махавира, Заратустра, Мухаммед – ни у кого из них нет научного подхода. Они являются великими основателями религий. Они изменили весь шаблон человеческого ума и его структуру, но их подход не является научным. 
Патанджали, он как Эйнштейн в мире будд. Он является феноменом. Он с легкостью мог бы получить Нобелевскую премию, как Эйнштейн, или Бор, или Макс Планк, или Хайзенберг. У него такой же подход, та же точка зрения, как у скрупулезного научного ума. Он не поэт, Кришна – поэт. Он не моралист, Махавира – моралист. По сути, он ученый, который думает в рамках закона. И он установил абсолютные законы человеческого существа, окончательную рабочую структуру человеческого ума и реальности.   
И если вы будете следовать Патанджали, вы узнаете, что он точен так же, как любая математическая формула. Просто делайте то, что он говорит, и результат случится. Результат просто должен случится, это как два плюс два равно четыре, это как если вы доведете воду до кипения при 100 градусах, и она испарится. Никакой веры не нужно, вы просто делаете это и знаете. Это нечто, что нужно сделать, чтобы узнать. Вот почему я говорю, что не существует сравнения: никогда на земле не существовал такой человек, как Патанджали.
Йога – это чистая наука. И в том, что касается йоги, Патанджали – самое великое имя. Этот человек – большая редкость, нет никого, кто мог бы сравниться с Патанджали. Впервые в истории человечества этот человек привел религию к статусу науки. Он сделал религию наукой; чистые законы, не требующие никакой веры.
Так называемая религия нуждается в верованиях. Нет никакой другой разницы между одной и другой религиями, разница только в верованиях. Мусульманин имеет определенные верования, индуисты – другие, христиане – другие. Разница – в верованиях. В йоге нет ничего, что касается верований; йога не говорит верить во что-либо. Йога говорит «получите опыт». Так же как и наука говорит «экспериментируйте», йога говорит «получите опыт». Провести эксперимент и получить опыт означает одно и то же; просто направления разные. Провести эксперимент означает, что есть что-то, что вы можете сделать снаружи; получить опыт означает, что есть что-то, что вы можете сделать внутри. Опыт – это внутренний эксперимент.
Наука говорит: «Не надо верить, сомневайтесь столько, сколько можете», но также говорит «не отрицайте», потому что отрицание – это тоже какой-то вид верования. Вы можете верить в бога, вы можете верить в концепцию, в которой бога нет. Вы можете сказать, что у бога фанатичный подход; вы можете сказать что-то совершенно противоположное, что бог не такой, с таким же фанатизмом. Атеисты, теисты – все они являются верующими, а вера – это не сфера для науки. Наука означает пройти через какой-то опыт, и для этого не нужна никакая вера.    
Osho, The Path of Yoga, Talk #1 


Патанджали, я называю его ученым всего религиозного мира, математиком мистики, логиком алогичного. В нем встречаются две противоположности. Если ученый читает йога сутры Патанджали, он сразу же понимает. Витгенштейн, логический ум, сразу почувствует родство с Патанджали. Он полностью логический. И если он ведет вас в направлении алогичного, он ведет такими логичными шагами, что вы никогда не поймете, где он оставил логику и вывел вас за ее пределы.
Он двигается как философ, мыслитель и делает такие тонкие разграничения, что в тот момент, когда он погружает вас в нирвачару, в не-созерцание, вы не сможете увидеть, когда этот прыжок случился. Он разделил этот прыжок на много маленьких шагов.    
С Патанджали вы никогда не почувствуете страха, потому что он знает, где вы его почувствуете. Он разделяет шаги еще и еще так, как будто вы почти двигаетесь по ровной земле. Он ведет вас так медленно, что вы не можете наблюдать, когда случился прыжок, когда вы пересекли границу. И еще он поэт, мистик – очень редкое сочетание.
Существуют такие мистики, как Тилопа, такие великие поэты, как риши из Упанишад, великие логики как Аристотель, но вы не сможете найти Патанджали. Он является таким сочетанием, что с его появлением нет никого, кто мог бы с ним сравниться. Очень легко быть поэтом, потому что вы состоите из одной части. Очень легко быть логиком – вы состоите из одной части. Почти невозможно быть Патанджали, потому что вы постигаете так много противоположностей – и он так гармонично и красиво их соединяет. Вот почему он стал альфой и омегой всей традиции йоги.
По сути дела, он не был тем, кто создал йогу; йога намного более древняя. Йога существовала много веков до появления Патанджали. Он не ее открыватель, но он почти стал открывателем и основателем просто из-за этой редкостной комбинации его личности. Много людей работало до него, и почти все было известно, но йога ждала Патанджали. И внезапно, когда Патанджали заговорил о ней, все повиновалось, и он стал ее основателем. Он не являлся основателем, но его личность – это такое сочетание противоположностей, он охватывает в себе столько необъятных элементов, он стал основателем, почти основателем. Теперь йога будет всегда ассоциироваться с Патанджали.   
 Osho, Yoga: The Mystery Beyond Mind, Talk #5 

Sunday, 15 November 2015

"We think we are living a real life, in a real countries, speaking real languages and having real important or unimportant social roles.. In this Maya or illusion, only language of Love is real, and once you become aware that everything is God, only that moment you can see what others cannot see, with the eyes of your heart.. "
( Mihaela Maya)
Смайлик «heart»